6 Cape Town with her. This trip was sanctioned by her male family members. They travelled from the Eastern Cape to Cape Town by taxi and after their arrival, resided with the appellant’s brother and his wife in their shared home in Phillippi. During the period in which the complainant resided with the appellant in Cape Town, he would leave each morning to seek employment while she was required to remain behind and attend to household chores. [11] Sexual intercourse took place between them on various occasions (the complainant maintained that there were seven such occasions within a matter of a few days after their arrival in Cape Town, all of which were against her will). Within the same period the appellant and complainant argued. During one of their arguments the complainant sustained an open wound to her leg. It was shortly thereafter that the complainant fled from the appellant on 2 March 2010. On the same date she reported the events to the police, who took her to be examined by a doctor on 3 March 2010. [12] At issue in the trial were the following: 12.1 Whether the complainant travelled willingly with the appellant from the Eastern Cape to Cape Town, and remained in Cape Town willingly with him until she fled, or whether she was trafficked to Cape Town by the appellant for purposes of exploitation or abuse of a sexual nature;