Whereas the cassation decision (the subject matter of the request) has committed to such judgment which approves the foregoing, its adjudication should have committed to the proper law and has nothing defective therein from legal point of view along with no violation of sharia provisions.As such, it should have to be upheld. Whereas the review request is groundless and useless, it worth cancellation and I amin the opinion if the colleagues agree, that our judgment is to be entered as to cancel the request. Al Tayeb Abd Al Ghafoor Abd Al Wahab Supreme Court Judge 08/07/2015 Mohamed Yassin Al Sheikh Idris Supreme Court Judge 12/07/2015 I agree and add that the matter should be brought forward before the executing court if the creditor and debtor so agree, but in event of appearance of any sign of disagreement upon not terminating the consideration by reason of employment or end of the phase, any dispute means that the trial court should direct the claimant to file a claim for forfeiture of alimony in respect of which it should discuss points of dispute between them that means resemblance to the debts of inheritance if not acknowledged by the heirs. Salah Al Tigani Al Amin Supreme Court Judgment 14/07/2015 I agree with my colleagues in the Circuit that the executing court is an automatic court responsible for enforcement of the judgment, but if proved before it that the fostered child for whom the alimony is imposed has been graduated from the university and reached a level at which his counterparts may earn and becomes self-reliance as a result of his earing, the alimony must be forfeited (please refer to the cassation decision No, 1/2015 dated 06/01/2005 - judgments Magazine for 2005 page 11 without the need for entering a new judgment proving the same)) Fadya Ahmed Abd Al Kader Supreme Court Judge 23/07/2015