2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Page2 That the Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in finding that the Appellant is a man without the slightest scruple. That the Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in accepting Respondent's evidence above that of the evidence given by Appellant. That the Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in finding that Respondent's evidence need not be corroborated in the claim for seduction. That the. Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in not allowing absolution from the instance under claim A. That, in respect of the claim for seduction, the Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in awarding damages for the full bohali and not the reduced bohali by virtue of the alleged seduction.' I proceed to summarise the facts. Plaintiff, then aged about 16, met the Defendant, then aged about 45, at a bus stop in Maseru town. She was looking for work as a domestic servant. She was an orphan brought up by her grandfather, but he too had died in 1979 and it would seem as if she was then destitute. Defendant did employ Plaintiff as a housekeeper, but there is a dispute between the parties as to whether there was any agreement about monthly wages and whether such wages were ever paid. Plaintiff alleges that it was whilstshe was in Defendant's employ and some time before May 1980, that Defendant had had intercourse with her_and that as a result of this intercourse she became pregnant. The Chief Justice in his judgment summarises her evidence thus : 4/....