(b) that material facts were withheld from the Court that varied the order or material evidence previously given before such Court was false." In the instant case this Appeal seeks to vary the order of maintenance made by the lower Court on 18th February, 2008, but the Appellant has not presented anything before this Court to indicate that since the Order was made the circumstances by the parties or either of them or of the child for whose benefit the Order was made have changed to such an extent as to justify this Court varying the Order of maintenance made by the trial Court. The Appellant had not also contended at the hearing of this Appeal that material facts were withheld from the trial Court that made the order or that material evidence previously given before the trial Court was false. If any of these circumstances had existed at the hearing of this Appeal, the Appellant upon an application for leave to adduce fresh evidence would have been granted an indulgence by this Court. In the instant case if there is any party that withheld vital material from the trial Court, it is the Appellant because he refused to disclose the sums generated as rent from his second house. He who comes to equity must come with clean hands. I see no merit in this Appeal and it is hereby dismissed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 79(a) & (b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act Cap 220 LFN 1990, I hereby confirm the decision of the trial Court delivered on 18th February, 2008. I will however not make any order as to cost.