I • J21 She submitted that in the present case, PWl's position was difficult but she managed to inform her grandmother and teacher. She dismissed the appellant's allegation that the prosecutrix was bitter with the appellant as being baseless. With regard to the issue that no one saw the appellant and PWl going out together, she submitted that according to PWl, they did not pass through the reception but the back gate. In response to the issue of PWl's pantie and beddings being clean after her sexual encounter, she submitted that according to evidence on record, PWl narrated that the appellant released on her stomach where he rubbed the medicine. She said that this therefore explained the mystery of the clean pantie and beddings. She urged this Court to dismiss this ground for lacking merit. With regard to ground two, Mrs. Kachaka acknowledged that it is the prosecution's duty to prove a criminal allegation against an accused beyond all reasonable doubt. She submitted that such duty was ably discharged in this case. She submitted that the appellant failed to discredit the prosecution evidence and that it is on record, whereas his witnesses contradicted