entrusted with to her care, without permission from their father. It is however allowed for her to travel accompanied by the children to the home where she was officially bonded to him in marriage. However, that exception is governed by various conditions that the parties could not discuss in detail and thus to present evidence of what is best for the children, with consideration to the rights of the father. So, dismissing the case, without due considerations to these reasons deprives the parties from presenting their pleas. Hence, I conclude, after the agreement of my colleagues in the circuit, that we cancel the challenged decision of dismissal of the plaint, and return the documents to the Court of First Instance to act in accordance to this memo. Hamid Alamin Abdullah Court of Appeal Judge 19/9/2015 Salahudin Mahjoub Sidahmed Court of Appeal Judge 30/9/2015 Ibrahim Mohammed Ali Altobji Court of Appeal Judge 29/9/2015 3