(3) That the learned trial judge erred in law and 5 passing an excessive sentence against appellant in all circumstances thereby occasioning a miscarriage ofjustice. ' ,_ 1o - -- . coruisel Mr. Donge appellant and 3rd to and Jst together one complaint was that, penetration, an 15 proved the prosecution. He learned trial relied on was Ill submitted the medical the .only word was a serious error and of urgued that once one discounts the medical evidence 20 which that hymen was not recently were no InJunes seen on private evidence of to her mother in law, people the following 1 that 3 on that was 30 reported other which was an counsel On and 2 appellant an opportunity reform. In his view a the refore called of 15 years was and that a our 1Oyears would been circumstances. 3 in the