the related fees on: 19/03/2015, objecting to the decision issued by Khartoum Court of Appeal under No.: A##/502/#/2014, issued on: 26/10/2014 and appellant took cognizance of the contested decision on:08/03/2015, therefore, the objection is admitted in form. In subject; the facts can be summarized in that, appellant has raised his case before the Trial Court claiming recovery of the amount paid for the official engagement, amounting to SP 4500 (four thousands five hundred Sudanese pounds only), alleging that she has retreated the engagement, she ratified and alleged that retreating was from his side because he has committed certain acts contrary to Sharia principles and asked her to accompany him to a far place, where they will be alone and he denied that. Failing to prove her statement by evidence, she requested that he will be sworn under oath, which he did and the Court issued its judgment favouring his claims. Respondent did not accept the judgment and has submitted her appeal before the Court of Appeal, which, has issued its judgment to quash the judgment decided by the Trial Court and to refer the papers back to the Trial Court to decide upon its memorandum. The Court of Appeal stated that appellant has given the respondent some items, part of which are perishable and that the cash amount for engagement is deemed a gift, that all items that had perished or used cannot be given back, according to Hanfia school and the Court of Appeal ordered the Trial Court to work upon the contents of its memorandum. The Appellant did not agree with the decision of the Court of Appeal, because it included certain things which were not stated by the respondent, therefore, the appellant requested the cancellation of the decision of the Court of Appeal and called for the decision issued by the Trial Court.