After perusing the papers, I don’t see any hope for this objection to be successful, as it is known that, the Supreme Court is a law Court and the decision issued by the Court of Appeal is legally valid, however, the reasons of the attorney of the appellant, with regards to beating, it has been originally denied, so how come it became disciplinary in this stage, knowing that, this stage is not for raising new defenses. Regarding the statement that, the Court of Appeal has relied on the accusation witness No.(1), which is a hearsay, the Court did not rely on that but has relied on his admission of beating( please refer to its memorandum page (2). Therefore, if my respectful colleagues agree, I believe that the objection shall be cancelled on summary basis and the appellant shall be ordered to pay the fees. Al Obaid Zain Al Abdeen Babikir. Judge at the Supreme Court 23/08/2015 I agree Mustafa Alhadi Salih “signed” Judge at the Supreme Court 24/08/2015 I agree Al Tayeb Abdul Wahab Abdul Ghafoor “signed” Judge at the Supreme Court 26/08/2015 Final Order: The objection shall be cancelled on summary basis and appellant shall pay fees.