In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful General Court of Rabak Number A S CH / 6/2016 The 17/1/2016 Enter Hawa Abkar Ismael Appellant Against Haron Yehya AlTaher Respondent Memorandum: This appeal was filed in 3/1/2016 and the decision was issued on 4/1/2016, and therefore it is admissible because it was submitted within the specified time frame. In regard to the subject matter, we detail what is been stated in the Appeal Memorandum: A Past-Period Spousal Alimony for the period of a year and half, an amount of 3600 Pounds, and a Following period Spousal Alimony, a monthly amount of 200 Pounds as Child support alimony, for the following children: Mahasen/Samia/Somaia. A Monthly amount of 300 Pounds, to be divided equally among them. Also, a Past-Period child Alimony to be paid for the amount of 5400 starting from the date of filing the claim 16/11/2015, with an order to pay in compliance and permission for the to borrow. The Appellant disputes the decision and its interpretation and application of the law, by making the following argument: It is considered the righteous position that the validity of the Child Alimony comes after agreeing the end of a Spousal Alimony, and its decision shall include the Spousal Alimony. There is no statement confirming the defendant income; witnesses have testified that PastPeriod Child Alimony has being from October 2015; however, the court still ruled to instate Past-Period Spousal Alimony payment. The Appellant requested the decision of the court of first instance to be cancelled. Mr. Mohamed Ahmed Ezeldein submitted a counter appeal on behave of the Respondent; he faulted the court judgment of the first instance that it did not apply the demand for an Alimony of clothing, housing and Schooling expenses. He agreed that on his reply to the original appeal accepted the ending of Spousal Alimony agreement, but the court reinstated it. He demand the revocation of the judgment of the court, and the issuance of a new judgment satisfying all the all requests of the Appellant.