First: Facts: On 19/08/2015, the Complainant / Ejlal Elamin Elobeid reported that the convicted Mohamed Adam Garma kidnapped Tasabih Elsamani Mohamed Ahmed from the school to unknown destination. After necessary investigations, the accused was arrested, and the victim was sent for medical examination. The decision after the examination was that the hymen had been broken long before and had no signs of any recent injuries. The report was referred to trial, where the judgment subject of request was issued. Second: After reviewing the statement of claim, the judgment intended to be reviewed, came in accordance with the Law and the Islamic Sharia provisions and judiciary rules. Also, The High Court has the right to intervene in the evidences if the judgment issued by sub-courts is not suitable or acceptable. Referring to the judicial precedent No. 2003 p 161, I see that, my colleagues agree with me, to reject the request and support the judgment intended to be reviewed. Signed Abbas Ali Babiker Judge of the High Court 22/02/2017 Signed Taj Elsir Osman Abdulgadir Judge of the High Court 06/03/2017 Signed Sala Eltigani Elamin Judge of the High Court 07/03/2017 Signed Tarig Eldaw Ayoub Elimam Judge of the High Court 20/03/2017 Signed Elaraki Elraya Elolaish Judge of the High Court 28/03/2017 Final Order: • The request is to be rejected Signed Abbas Ali Babiker Judge of the High Court Chairperson of the Circuit 28/03/2017