decision and on the subject. In the face of these pieces of evidence, reconciliation occurred between the appellant and the respondent. The appellant telephoned the respondent and asked her to return home when she was found in a social club, which the responded interpreted as an accusation on her honor. It is known that the reconciliation forgives what preceded it, and it is likely that the respondent thinks that the appellant ordered her to return home because he doubted her, when he found her in a social club. It also seems that none of the witnesses knew the details of the problem of the appellant. So the Trial Court was right in its decision to dismiss the lawsuit, and therefore I move to cancel the Court of Appeal decision and to support the judgment of the Trial Court. Signature of: Signature of: Muhammad Abu Zaid Osman, AL Bushra Osman Salih Seal of Seal of: The president of supreme court 23/9/2008 the president of supreme court 25/9/2008 Signature of: Muhammad Ibrahim Muhammad Seal of: The president of supreme court 28/9/2008 Final order: * Abolition the decision of the contested Court of Appeal and restore the judgment of the trial court to reject the case and support it. Signature of: Muhammad Ibrahim Muhammad Seal of: The president of supreme court Circle Chief 28/9/2008

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3