13
court could impose a sentence, within the limits of its general
jurisdiction.23 That also had some academic support. Thus Professor
Snyman writes:
‘If a statutory provision creates a criminal norm only, but remains silent on the
criminal sanction … the punishment is simply in the court’s discretion, that is, the
court itself may decide what punishment to impose.’24
The high court’s decision effectively holds that this latter proposition is
incorrect and that, in the absence of a statutorily prescribed penalty, no
offence is created, however clear the language of the statutory provision.
That is necessarily implicit in its conclusion that the charge sheet failed to
disclose an offence. In other words it held that the absence of a penalty
provision in the Act in respect of these offences meant that the relevant
sections did not give rise to an offence at all.
[15] This conclusion conflates the operation of the two maxims. One
can readily see that, when a court is confronted with the question whether
a statutory provision prohibiting particular conduct is a crime, the failure
of the legislature to attach a penalty to non-compliance is an important
factor in determining whether a crime was constituted thereby. This was
the determining factor in this court in R v Zinn,25 where it was held that a
Besluit by the Transvaal Volksraad, prohibiting the use or occupation of
land in townships by ‘Coloured’ people, did not, in the absence of a
criminal penalty, create a criminal offence. Greenberg JA, who gave the
judgment of the court, carefully refrained from deciding whether, in the
absence of both an express statement of criminality and a penalty, it was
23 R v Forlee 1917 TPD 52 and the cases cited in paras 40 and 41 of the judgment of Blignault J in the
high court.
24 C Snyman Criminal Law 5 ed 41. This passage, appearing in the third edition, was cited by
Ackermann J in S v Francis 1994 (1) SACR 350 (C) at 355d-h, with apparent approval. See also
Milton and Cowling South African Criminal Law and Procedure Volume III Statutory Offences 2 nd
edition para 1-20; M A Rabie and M C Maré Rabie and Strauss Punishment: An Introduction to
Principles (4 ed) 81-82.
25 R v Zinn 1946 AD 346.
اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3
الاتصال بفقرة
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
أضف إلى جدول المحتويات