sexual relations because of diabetes; Considering that .... reiterating what she said at the first hearing, stated that after every lunch she used to go to the balcony, and it was there that the accused found her, took off her trousers and panties, before lying on top of her and penetrating her; That during the sexual relations, she felt pain and bled; that the accused then threatened her with death if she ever denounced him; that it was in these circumstances that he raped her several times at the balcony; Considering that madam… confirmed previous statements adding that the gynecologist confirmed old sexual penetration since the facts happened for duration of one year; Considering that in light of these contradicting statements the court ordered urological expertise to determine whether the accused could have sexual intercourse, if not since when he couldn’t have sexual relations; that the urological service of the Aristide DANTEC Hospital submitted the report on 03.03. 2020; Considering that the debates were then reopened on 10 March 2020; Considering that, when reheard, the accused referred to his preliminary statements, while specifying that, he was communicated his diabetes medical file with all the related analysis papers; Considering that the claimant for civil damages did not appear at the hearing; Considering that the solicitor general pointed out that even if the report does not provide the court with official information, its content supports the position of the accused on his impotency; That in the face of diverging statements of parties, he asked the court to override the contested judgment and acquit the accused; Considering the pleadings of ….and …, counsels of the accused pointing out that the expert did not clearly allude to the questions of the court while it was evident that the accused was suffering from diabetes and had visual problems; That in addition the claimant for civil damages, after dithering in his statements chose not to appear at the hearing; That according to them, the girl started to complain of pain in the belly before the doctor discovered the absence of