Whereas it has not been clearly established that the accused planned or used drugs to provide an abortion to the victim; that for the benefit of doubt he be discharged of abortion; b- Defamation charges pressed against S.O Whereas S.O is accused of defamation; Whereas according to article 524(4) of the Penal Code, defamation through statements, yelling, threats aired in public meetings or places, in writing, printed flyers given out or sold, put for sale or presented in crowded places using bill boards, posters exposed publicly, by any other broadcasting means shall be punished by a oneto-five-year prison term and a CFA F 500,000 (five hundred thousand) to CFA F 2,000,000 (two million) fine where it is done by means of electronic communication or two to six months’ imprisonment and CFA F 250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand) to CFA F 500,000 (five hundred thousand) where this defamation is committed with individuals, that for it to be established, defamation suggest, publicity, allegation of or imputing a specific fact to a person or a protected body and a premeditation; Whereas as it is, the accused is being indicted for posting on the Facebook social network that C.R has HIV/AIDS and is a sex worker; Whereas from the content of the file and arguments presented in hearings, no evidence to show that S.O made such a post on Facebook was presented, that it would be proper to grant him the benefit of doubt as to his actions; that he should therefore be release: c- Pimping charges pressed against S.O and U.F Whereas pimping charges are pressed against S.O and U.F: