Flagrante delicto
REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL

HIGH COURT OF PIKINEUEDIWAYE

--------------------DAKAR COURT OF APPEAL

ORDINARY PUBLIC HEARING OF
19 NOVEMBER 2019

-------------------HIGH COURT OF
PIKINE-GUEDIAWAYE

At the ordinary public hearing of the High Court of Pikine Guediawaye
of November nineteen two thousand and nineteen, held for the cases of

Prosecution
No :
Judgment No

PUBLIC PROSECUTION

correctional police by xx, judge at the seat:
President assisted by Mr. xxx a n d
Madam xxx
In the presence of Mr. xxx, Deputy Prosecutor of the Public Prosecutor
and with the assistance of Master xxx, Registrar, was rendered the
following judgment:
PARTIES:
Mr. the Public Prosecutor, applicant according to the report of an
interrogation of flagrante delicto of September 20, 2019;

And
(Civil Party)

And
xxx born February 21, 2001 in Pikine, xxx domiciled
in Thiaroye Tally Diallo, tel xxx, Civil Party, not
appearing at the hearing;

ON ONE HAND
VERSUS

xxx

VERSUS
XXX, born January 10, 1997 in Kolda, xxx, trader, domiciled in Thiaroye Sant
Yalla, single without children, saying he has never been convicted, nor listed
in the military file;
I

Accused of unlawful collection of personal data and rape; Detained according
to the arrest warrant of September 20, 2019; Appearing at the hearing, assisted
with his Counsel;
ON THE OTHER

OFFENCE

Unlawful collection of
personal data and rape

e

DECISION
(See operative part)

Questioned at the hearing on September 27, 2019 in accordance with
Article 384 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused declared that
he wanted to be tried immediately but the case was postponed, for the
civil party to appear on October 15, 2019, then on October 29, 2019,
then on November xxx, 2015 and finally on November 15, 2019, date on
which, it has argued;
Madam President explained that the Public Prosecutor has sued the
aforementioned defendant to the hearing of this day to defend himself due to
the above mentioned offenses;
And the accused was questioned; the registrar took note of his answers;
The Public Minister requested a closed prison sentence of five (05) years
against the accused; Counsel for the accused presented his means of defense;
On this, the debates were closed and the case put on deliberation for judgment
to be delivered at the hearing of November 19, 2019. In the event of the
hearing of that day, the court, after having deliberated in accordance with the
law, ruled in these terms:

Select target paragraph3