The second reason, on the evidence presented by the accusation, I find there is no direct evidence on the victim who reported the convicted rapist, is that there are no circumstantial evidences that lead to the conviction of the convict, according to her terms a previously established in jurisprudence Government of Sudan / against/ Habib Allah kheer Allah M A M K /33/1976 Published by journal of judicial rules in 1976, page number 639. Where indicate: {Circumstantial evidence in order to serve as a basis for a conviction shall be conclusive in nature and gave her to refrain from any collection other than the guilt of the accused and it explains one direction is the guilt of the accused}, where that accused document is the medical evidence and the charge is a charge 2 which contains: No. M A / A S G/ 659/ 2018 No sperm of the convicted person was found. The act of Indictment alleges that the hymen of the victim was eliminated in the past. All this has created strong suspicions around the accusations. It is in the interest of the condemned. Like in many established jurisprudence. Sudan Government / against/ Ibrahim Algali Soliman M A / M K /30/1976 Published by journal of judicial rules in 1976, page number 662 Published in the journal of judgments of Sudan. If my colleagues are in agreement, we will cancel the decision of the tribunal and release the convicted immediately unless wanted on other procedures. May Allah help. Signature of: Tag Elden Idris Muhammad Seal of: The president of Appeal Tribunal Omdurman 25/3/2018 Agree Signature of: Asaad Awad Allah Salih Ibrahim Seal of: The president of Appeal Tribunal Omdurman No. M A / A S G/ 659 /2018 Signature of: Ali Ahmed Hamid Mansoor Seal of: The president of Appeal Tribunal Omdurman 1/4/2018