Republic of the Sudan Sudan judiciary Court of appeal Omdurman Criminal Section: Circle: Mr. Tag Eldeen Idris Muhammad Judge in Appeal Mordali Ahmed Hamid Mansoor Judge in Appeal Masada Awad Salim Ibrahim Judge in Appeal President Member Member Trial of the accused _ Bashir Muhammad Abdulrahim No. A S G/659/2018 The Judgement On the date 14/2/2015 the president of General court at the Child court Omdurman _ decreed Judge in criminal case No. 27/1/2018 decree sentence Bashir Muhammad Idris under Article 45/B from child law in 2010 decreed life imprisonment ,twenty years considering from the date of guard rail, 21/1/2018, and penalty as (10000), and allocate (8000) for the victim, and (2000) left as penalty according to Article (198) from Code of Criminal Procedure of 1991. On the date 26/2/2018, on behalf of convicted, the lawyers Adam Abakar Muhammad Musa, and Aamar Fadul Bagal offered this appeal against the judgement, and it decided to accept it formally, according to the two Articles (183) (184) from Code of Criminal Procedure of 1991. On the subject, the appellant seeks the decision of this court to Cancel the judgment of Trial court and replace it with another which acquires the acquittal of the convicted person, or take the right and fair order as following: No.M A/A S G/ 659/2018 1/ The court violated all applicable international laws and treaties, and the constitution of Sudan, because it didn't give the convict a fair trial, so there wasn't a lawyer and advocate to defend the convict, in clear violation of article (135), of the code of criminal procedure, and the convict was judged in two sittings only. 2/ They did not provide enough evidence to charge his client, with the evidence of witnesses or medical evidence. There was also a question about whether medical evidence must be interpreted in favors of the convicted person. The essential facts are summarized in that the plaintiff informed that the girl went to the Convict’s shop, and she came back home crying, signifies that the convict raped her, and procedures were against him, until the appeal judgement. The first reason of the grounds of appeal is the violating international treaties and conventions, and article 135 of the criminal procedures of the year 1991. I am in complete agreement with the appellant, that the Court dismisses the condemned right to obtain a fair trial. The charge was serious, and the court summoned a lawyer to defend the convict in a bid to obtain fair trial.