3 Considering the report of Madam advisor xxx Considering the request of Mr. Advocate General; Having regard to the documents in the file; After having deliberated in accordance with the law; Considering that by acts of appeal dated 21 and 29 November 2019, xxx and xxx respectively appealed against the judgment n ° 2353 rendered on November 12, 2019 in a correctional matter by the High Court of Pikine-Guediawaye in the case opposing them to the public prosecutor, and rendered the judgment whose operative part is as follows: “Ruling publicly, after trial, in correctional matters and in first instance; In the form Declares admissible the public action; On Merits Re-characterizes the acts of attempted rape on minors under 13 years initially brought against the defendants, in indecent assault without violence; Declares them guilty of it as well as of the surplus; Sentences them to a penalty of two (02) years of imprisonment each after confusion of the penalties in application of articles 320, 320 bis, 348 and 433 of the Criminal Code; Declares admissible the action of the civil parties; Sentences xxx to pay the sums of 3,000,000 francs to xxx, 3,000,000 francs to xxx, 3,000,000 francs to xxx and 3,000,000 francs to Fatoumata. Sentences xxx to pay the sum of 3,000,000 Francs as damages; Orders the provisional execution; The accused pays the costs; Set the maximum imprisonment term for failure to pay the reparations”; Considering that the following acts dated 21 and 29 November 2019, the Public Prosecutor filed an incidental appeal against the same decision; Considering that all the parties have appeared assisted by their counsels: that it befits to rule after trial regarding them; In the Form Considering that the appeals were made in the required form and before they were time barred; whereas they shall be declared admissible; On merits On public action Considering that it emerges from the procedure that on September 6, 2019, xxx lodged a