Whether (iii) a<:cused participated the In-his-submissi0n,--Mr. -Nabende-for-the accused to this -said prosecution-fai] ed to. connect That because the evidence the deceased made could not see the blood stained That although the accused he held a said to it was the scene. revealed whether did not see the accused l.ISe of PW.3 said he met n was 100 metres it. Further that the iu.v.uvv be knife. That the about the time of offonce. That accused he heard was shaking and shivering alarm at 5:00p.m. of telling lies. PW.3 ought to have arrested the accused witness PW.3 being a police he met the running and revealed that he had killed his wife. That the evidence of PWA should not be admitted because he did not a .and caution Further that the to kill the deceased was not tendered in evidence. That knife not proved of a blood was being. defence of alibi was not disproved. The accused was at home at the That maternal alibi is proved by DW.2 DW.3 son to the~~~·~" +.hat Finally, Mr. deceased. On murder it had other hand prosecution submitted the person on all ingredients evidence adduced by it. The prosecution case substantially relied on circumstantial Circumstantial evidence connect ·o (.)