The accused was convicted under Article 45/B (rape of children) of the Child Act and Article 135 of the Criminal Act – in the appeal, only the conviction under the Child Act was maintained. The appeal focused on the fact that the victim has two age estimations. The Supreme Court judgement considers the victim to be an adult, noting that there is a contradiction between the Child Act and the Criminal Act. Various cases and opinions by legal scholars are cited. The conviction under the Child Act is upheld, it is to be adjusted and read in conjunction with Article 86/F of this Act (related to penalties).