That the succession mass is composed of a concession and a bare plot located respectively in
Torokorobougou and Magnambougou;
That the concession inTorokorobougou was built by Sekou KANTE during his lifetime, with an
annual rent of 600,000CFAF, which rent was managed by Assitan DIARRA since the death of
Sékou KANTE to date; that Assitan refused to transfer ownership to the legitimate heirs, though
she is not an heir of Sekou KANTE but simply the uterine sister of the KANTE children, that
their mother Saran TOURE had her from a previous marriage before remarrying with their father
and divorcing;
That after the death of Sekou KANTE, Saran TOURE settled in their concession in
Torokorobougou, that it is with their father’s rents that Assitan DIARRA built the house for her
mother in the concession in Torokorobougou;
That it follows from the heredity judgment that neither Saran TOURE nor Assitan DIARRA are
heirs of the deceased Sekou KANTE, that Assitan DIARRA has no standing to intervene as a
non-disputing party and formulate claims in favour of her mother Saran TOURE.
That moreover, the expert evaluation of the real property was not done properly and according to
the rules in that the concession and the plot of land have been undervalued, that the court should
declare inadmissible the intervention of DIARRA Assitan, order a second expert opinion on the
concession based in
Torokorobougou; or rule extraordinarily that the succession mass consisting of the concession
based in Torokorobougou worth 17,445,067 CFAF shall be shared between the legally known
heirs.
Whereas Mrs. Nientao Assitan DIARRA, through her counsel Issouf FANE, in reply, stresses
that she is the uterine sister of Bakary and Barou KANTE, that it was with their accord that she
invested up to 10,980,480 CFAF in the house at Torokorobougou, that she therefore has an
interest to intervene to seek the separation of the value of her investments from the succession
mass, in accordance with Article 62 of the CPCCS;
That besides, it was the court that ordered the expert evaluation of the assets making up the
succession mass, that the National Department of Town Planning and Housing carried out the
expert evaluation according to the rules by setting the total value of the estate at 17,445,067
CFAF, that this value is the same as that contained in the expert report of BETRAP-SARL;
That another request for an expert evaluation merely constitutes a delay tactic;
Pleads that the Court should annul the judgment appealed against and order the heirs to
reimburse, to her, 10,768,734 CFAF, value of her investments, which will be deducted from
proceeds realised from the sale of the house;