In respect to his arrest, the accused testified that on 7/09/2006 11 am, he was a one at Kulusambiya by police officers in the presence of lyejusa. In his statement he waiting, one the stage". around Baly~jusa, the area L<:! : 11 As I was still at the stage ch~irpe_rson cC,\me and . arrested me lndeed,PW6, Balyejusa Charles, the chairperson L Cl of Namasinga vii testified how, upon information received from PW4, he arranged for the arrest the accused ,at Kulusambiya trading center, as he was heading to Kakira for work. From the totality of on record, the court holds that prosecution witnesses PW4 and PWS have put the accused at the scene of crime and that their evidence has corroborated sufficiently to destroy the accused's alibi. In agreement with the the court accordingly accused's alibi and finds that it was the iJccused that pa the· pated in unlawful sexual intercourse with PWS. Throughout the trial, the accused did not show any emotion or remorse at what he had done. He remained aloof, cold and stone-hearted. During cross-examination,. he was hesitant, capricious and vacil responses. I the impression that he was improvising in his evidence and was an accomplished liar. I do not find accused to be a truthful person and his overall demeanor quite poor. The alone in his that the accused was living the time, could have provided the temptation to act the way he did, notwithstanding the fact that PWS was his niece. In criminal Is, inconsistencies in evidence a They can minor or major. Minor ones can be ignored or overlooked, unless they point to deliberate untruthfulness. Major ones are those considered to be going the root of the matter. They may result in evidence being rejected. In this 13