case such as how PWS was conveyed to the were inco police? Whether walked on own or was other is whether Rose Nandol before or after the a - -- - - -- - ,. n by bicycle? The an auntie to PWS, was called by PW4 of the accused? The other being whether or· - ---- - - .- '" -- PWS had a pant on when, PW4 first responded If y, In the cou deli and could In agreement with that assessment, all these inconsistencies were minor, not accounted for due lapse of time. unanimous opinion of court finds, prosecution has proved, all of the ingredients of the offence of defilement, beyond reasonable dou accused is accordingly c:onvir.ted \. lement c/s 129(1) of the Penal Code Act. ~~'llTO ~ JUDGE 13/11/2009 Sewankambo Hamuza ,for the State. Kabonesa Evelyn, for the accused. Accused present. Nabugwire Asinah, Court Clerk. Judgment read out in open court. JUDGE 13/11/2009 nkambo Hamuza: convict is a first offender. He however committed a very serious offence. The offence of defilement carries a 14