I have given such opinion in a previous judgment but the said Review Decision No. 69/2014 was issued the Review No. 159/2013 (unpublished). In application of whatsoever contained in the judicial precedent, observing the rules delivered by higher courts, which may stabilize judgments in prevention of any contradiction therewith and since the task of the judge is the application of law whether or not he is satisfied with justice of law, and his personal uncertainty will not constitute a reason for preventing him from applying the law, and he may give his opinion in writing, the reasons for his ruling or in proposals to the body having the right to legislation. ((See Cassation Decision 7/cassation/1972 Judgments Magazine 1972)) In consideration of the premises, the appealed judgment has been rendered in accordance with the law and nothing legally defective therein and should have to be upheld. Whereas the appeal is useless, it should have to be quashed. I am therefore of the opinion, agreed by my colleagues in the Circuit that our judgment should be rendered towards quashing the appeal. Al Tayeb Abdul Ghafoor Abdul Wahab Supreme Court Judge 17/02/2016 I agree and add that childbearing is the most important goal for marriage as justified by the Prophet (PBUH) who said: ((Marry the one who is fertile and loving, for I will be proud of your great number before the nations on the day of Resurrection)). Narrated by Ahmed and Abu Dawood, corrected by Al Iraqi and Al Albany. It is apparent that a woman is not prohibited from claiming for divorce by reason of lack of childbearing for harm and miss of the greatest goal of marriage. Since the claimant`s request for divorce has been realized, her request should have to be responded and I agree to the validity of the judgments delivered by the lower courts. Dr., Sittana Abdul Jalil Mohamed Supreme Court Judge 06/03/2016 Fadya Ahmed Abdul Qader Supreme Court Judge 13/03/2016