2 At the appeal of the case, the prosecutor explained that he sued the aforementioned defendants before the court at the hearing today to defend themselves on the above mentioned offences; And the defendants were questioned; The registrar took note of the statements and responses of the defendants; The public prosecutor summed up the case and requested a prison sentence of six (06) month against each; The defendants and their counsels presented their defense; Then the Tribunal, after having deliberated in accordance with the law, ruled in these terms: THE TRIBUNAL Considering the file exhibits; Considering the interrogation of the defendants; Considering the submissions of the Public prosecutor; After deliberation in accordance with the law; On the publication action Considering that according to the report of interrogation on the flagrant delicto the Public Prosecutor sued the following persons xxx before the Correctional Court accusing them of having, in Dakar, during the year 2015, in any case before time limitation of public action: collected personal data by using fraudulent means; to have, in the same circumstances of time and place, assaulted and inflicted lenient violence to xxx and xxx; Facts provided for and punished by Article (s): 431-22 of the Penal Code and 11, para 3 of Code of Administrative Offences; Whereas the defendants were questioned and admitted the facts; Whereas the Public Prosecutor has summed up the case and requested a six (06) month prison sentence against the prisoners; Whereas it emerges from the file and the hearing debates that the accusations against the defendants are constant, That it befits to declare them guilty, to sentence them each to a prison term of six (06) month and a fine of 500 000 CFA and order them to pays legal costs; On civil action: Whereas xxx and xxx regularly filed civil party action, claiming respectively the sums of 6,000,000 CFA francs and 10,000,000 CFA francs of damages; Whereas the actions of civil parties were made before the requests of the Ministry Prosecution, that it befits to declare them admissible; Whereas the sums requested appear exorbitant and that the court has objective means of quantification, that it befits to condemn the defendants to jointly pay them each the sum one million (1,000,000) CFA francs as damages for all causes of prejudice combined; to order the provisional execution, and to fix the prison term for non-payment to the maximum; FOR THESE REASONS DETAILS OF COSTS Ruling publicly, after trial, in correctional matters and at first instance: Filing: 10 000 F - Declares xxx and xxx guilty of the offences they are accused of; Tax: 600 frs X 4 - Sentences them to a suspended prison term of one (01) month and a fine of 500 000 FCFA; Extraction: 600F X4 - Declares admissible the civil actions of xxx and xxx