R.M v ATTORNEY GENERAL & 4 others [2010] eKLR (v) Whether the petitioner as an intersex person has the right to determine his gender or define his own sexual identity, or who should decide on issues of marriage and adoption? (vi) Whether the Government has failed to provide the petitioner and other intersex persons, corrective surgery and informed consents before such operations. (vii) Whether the petitioner’s rights under Section 82(1), (3) & (8) of the Constitution have been violated on grounds of sex. (viii) Whether the petitioner has suffered discrimination or been disadvantaged in education, seeking employment or housing due to his status. (ix) to vote. Whether the petitioner and other intersex persons have been denied their democratic right (x) Whether the petitioner’s detention at Kitui Police Station and confinement at Kamiti Maximum Prison is illegal or unconstitutional. (xi) Whether the petitioner’s rights under the Constitution were violated during the hearing of his Criminal Case No.1146 of 2005 at Kitui Court. (xii) Whether the provisions of Sections 28, 30, 31 and 38 of The Prisons Act and Rules 25 (1) 103 & 104 of The Prisons Rules are discriminatory against the petitioner, resulting in violation of his rights. (xiii) Whether the petitioner has suffered violation of his rights to privacy. (xiv) Whether the petitioner has suffered violation of his fundamental right against torture, cruel inhuman or degrading treatment provided under Section 74 of the Constitution. http://www.kenyalaw.org - Page 26/45