After perusing the judgment issued by the Trial Court, the decision issued by the Court of Appeal and the objection petition, we find that, plaintiff claims stay of execution and annulment of the judgment, the Trial Court should not have admitted the claim and it should have rejected the petition because the child is in the hands of the applicant and the judgment has confirmed what is actually confirmed, therefore, the judgment is not sound. With regard to the previous judgment, it shall be executable if it becomes final, however, the Trial Court has no right to annul it nor to interfere in the execution. As to the developments, they are new reasons for a new case to receive the child if he is with her and are not reasons to annul a previous judgment or to stay the execution. The investigation to identify the best of the child is conducted in cases of withdrawal of custody or delivering the child - subject of custody - from the hands where he is, therefore, the judgment issued by the Court of Appeal is sound and valid, and accordingly; the objection shall be cancelled on summary basis and the appellant shall pay the fees, if my colleagues have no objection. Al Bushra Osman Salih “signed” judge of the Supreme Court 09/08/2015 Adul Hameed Mohammed Abdul Hameed “signed” Judge of the Supreme Court 11/08/2015 Dr. Ahmed Abdul Mageed Judge of the Supreme Court 10/08/2015