mommg 7:00a.m. Although observed him There mJ was seeing the accused for the time, she broad evidence that condition vvas bad. appeared could not have elderly witness who accused as the man who attacked her. other ·evidence ruling out a mistaken identity on the part PW.2 was the duration of attack. Was this incident on a p·w.2 or a long that the incident lasted for 20 minutes. When P'N.2 was heading home holding her clothes in the hands and only in a second time. interception lasted coat she was confronted He rudely about 4 by the not to make giving PW.2 another opportunity to observe the accused. my considered view therefore, the witness, PW. 2 had to and at same The accused put up a defence of alibi that at 6:00a.m a went to work was not scene. That on that came back home at 4:00p.m only hotel many people who complainant. The accused has no duty to to disprove the alibi and put the satisfied that managed to put "l his alibi. This duty lies on scene I am prosecution evidence of PW.2, a single identifying witness at scene of crime. · 8