All these evidences confirm consent and acceptance of the appellant of her marriage contract throughout all stages; she had done and prepared herself for all the requirements of wedding and her follow up with the whole process is considered a strong evidence of consent. As to the issue mentioned in the objection petition that, such evidences are rebuttable and the Trial Court has failed to question the appellant about such ceremonies and all the things the appellant has done and accepted, this issue has been concluded before the lower courts, as the appellant has completely failed in proving the contrary/ opposite of those evidences and her full consent and acceptance were proved and that she had proceeded all acts that reflect them as married. The cassation decision No.: 7/1972 stated that, the examples included in the addendum of circular No.: 54, issued on: 06/08/1960 in proving acceptance of marriage were mentioned as examples to the criteria or standard of evidence from which an implied acceptance, provided that, such act shall be a consequence of marriage contract or an impact thereof. It was proved that, the fact that appellant had attended the ceremonies, prepared herself, accepted relatives congratulating her on her marriage and thereafter, as per the applicable customs travelled to Khartoum, met her husband attended the party and moved to the matrimonial house with her husband. All such practices are consequences and impacts of marriage contract and the cassation decision No.: 25/1973 has stated that, the examples illustrated in the above-mentioned Circular No.: (54) are evidenced that that indicate consent and shall be relied on if confirmed, that an indication implied by a legal evidence is imposed by law and is outside/ beyond the discretionary power of a judge, hence, it shall be admitted and relied on. Whereas, the contested judgment is sound and in accordance with the law and the rules of Sharia Law, if my respectful colleagues agree, I believe that the judgment shall be upheld and the objection shall be cancelled and the appellant shall be ordered to pay the respective fees. Dr. Sitanna Abdul Galil “signed”