3 reported this matter to the Bundung Police station whereat the deceased was summoned and cautioned. The deceased would however still come to his house in chase of his wife. He allegedly caught the deceased in copulation with his wife on the 25/12/2009, but preferred to report the deceased to his mother. As he went to report the deceased to his mother that evening, the deceased tried to restrain him from getting into their compound but was prevented from doing so by his mother. Whilst in the compound, the deceased tried to assault him but those around them prevented them from fighting. The deceased later reported him to the police. These are the brief facts of this case, at the close of which both sides elected to waive their right to address me. I now proceed to judgment by framing out the issues for determination as follows: (a) Did the victim die? (b) Did the death result from or caused by the accused person? (c) Were the acts of the accused done with the intention that death or grievous bodily harm would be the probable consequence? See the case of OMISORE V THE STATE (2008) 3 NCC, 60 I have looked at exhibits “A” and “B” – the death certificate and autopsy report of the deceased and both convincingly establish the fact that KAJALLY SANNEH died on the 15/01/2009. There is no iota of evidence in rebuttal. I take the facts contained therein as established. I am therefore satisfied that KAJALLY SANNEH died and this I shall hold as a fact.