v' • J19 In response to the allegations that the prosecutrix had many boyfriends and that Bobo had agreed to have sex with her, she submitted that he was not called to testify to that effect. She argued that the prosecutrix agreed that she had a boyfriend but she denied having sex with him except with the appellant. She submitted that this was corroborated by the medical report that indicated an old hymenal tear at 3 o'clock which is consistent with the fact that she had sexual intercourse two months before the examination was done. Mrs. Kachaka argued that it is irrelevant to this charge that whether PWl had sex with someone else or not because the charge is not about proving her virginity. She said that it is about the fact that the appellant being a relative to the prosecutrix had sex with her. In response to the appellant's contention that the prosecution should have called PWl's grandmother to corroborate her evidence, she agreed. She, however, submitted that the record clearly indicates that the woman became elusive to the extent that the prosecution found it difficult to secure her attendance. She further submitted that, however, PW3, who was told the same thing by PWl, testified. She further submitted that there are incidences in this case which provide something more. She referred to these as the noticeable decline in PWl's