Following consultation at the Abengourou Regional Hospital Center, the consulting doctor confirmed the traces of a sexual assault. When questioned, G. N said he was surprised to be questioned by the victim who is also his client. He asserted that at the time of the incident, he was shaving clients in his workshop. On his part, T.R insisted in detail that he was the perpetrator. She explained that it was on the way to the market that she was approached by the respondent who was in his workshop. That as she got inside, he closed everywhere and threatened to kill her if she didn't undress. Having done so, her assailant first inserted his finger into her genital, before using his penis thereafter. At the bar of the Court, despite the details provided by the victim, the defendant remained constant in his words. Mr T.S declared, on his part, not to constitute a civil action on behalf of his daughter. MOTIVES ON THE FORM G.N asserted his defense; it is appropriate to rule on the basis of counter argumentation ON THE MERIT 1/ On the public action Whereas G.N contests the charges of sexual indecency committed with violence on a minor under 15 years old; That however, knowing the latter very well, who is also their hairdresser, 12-year-old T.R explained in great detail the scene of the sexual assaults she suffered; That these acts were confirmed by the consulting medical doctor; That it is obvious that, despite the denials of the accused, there is no doubt that he is the perpetrator; That it is therefore appropriate to find him guilty and to apply the criminal law to him. 2 / On the civil action Whereas it is appropriate to give notice to Mr. TS of his non-constitution of civil party on behalf of his daughter. 2