e) accused' conduct, before, and after could provide corroboration to victim's testimony. The calling out to PWS to help him cook, givi PWS some medicine for her condition; following her i rooms while knowing that she would be th sl · ordering and play outsioe, would point to preparation ,whil - a ,, at around 11am, while on his way work, would point an altempted get away.PW4, testified to the court, how accused quickly preparing to go away from his home, she became aware of what had happened to PWS. f) The accused in his own statement made under cha a stated: "I followed her inside the said house and got her rooms' one of the her standing doing nothing. I was tempted and I to pull her down, removed her knickers' whitish in colour, remove from my trouser my erect penis and started penetrating into her vagina.I tried very much to penetrate inside but she was narrow but still failed decided to abandon the whole deed after failing penetration. I didn't ejaculate". own charge and , caution statement, can provide what PWS described. It that the accused's charge and caution and is a true account of what he did and what amou nspired on that day. The court notes that the statement was; a) Very and so detailed as to leave no doubt on the cou ind the maker knew what he was talking about. b) It is I knowledge by the maker of the various on had with his own mother, one Nuru Naluwolo Aidah, who is the mother of the victim, M mes lsabirye, as one of my It is ils can ~ncles and Muga court's finding that such personal faked. 8 ron p