the 1983 to 1987 period, representing CFAF 4,222,000 and which ordered that the the estate should be shared based on Muslim custom: That this appeal is admissible because it was filed in accordance with the legal procedures and time limits: 2 - AS CONCERNS THE MERITS : Whereas to support the appeal of VIadib NIARE, Me Mamadou DAFFE, A ttorney, counsel for the appellant and of the group of heirs of Gaoussou DRAME pitted against Kadiatou DIARRA argued that the deceased as per the law left behind two wives, Madio N1ARH and Fanta COURE, their respective children and two children from a religious marriage celebrated with KADIATOU DIARRA: That the latter is laying claim to the compound in Missira to be the share meant for her children: That paradoxically the appealed ruling requires the majority heirs of late Gaoussou DRAME to present the sum of CFAF 4,222,000, which corresponds to the rents collected by them : That this amount unsubstantiated by any proof has been imagined by Kadiatou DIARRA : That article 1315 of the Mali Civil Code provides: " whoever demands the enforcement of an obligation must proof it,"; That in this case, the judge has not stated the formula he is using to come up with this result : That given the abovementioned article, the judge is supposed to base his future agreement and decision on the relevance of facts on which the case is based: 21 June 1.921 DP 1921. 1. 120): That in any case, during the proceedings Kadiatou DIARRA did not present any evidence; ; that the contested ruling considers nothing but assumptions whereas it should have automatically or at the request of both or one of the parties ordered, prior to the interlocutory ruling, an expert evaluation on specific points: That furthermore, Me Aliou DEME, notary had been appointed custodian of the succession ; that he should provide a report on his management . Whereas Me Mamadou DAFFE concluded that that the known heirs of late Gaoussou DRAME are his two widows Nadio NIARE, Fanta TOURE and his eleven children : Mamadou,Kadiatou, Massaran, Moussa, Papa, Fanta, Lalla, Souleymane, Bintou, Ousmane and Assitan DRAME, counsel for the appellant desires that the majority heirs should remain in the compound at Medina-Coura and that they should be ordered to pay the two other heirs their share in cash. Whereas through the pleading of 2 May 1995, Me Mamadou DAFFE using the results of interlocutory rulings No. 485 cl 656 of 28/09/94 and 06/12/95 for 13 months, meaning from May 1983 to June 1984, set the amount for rents to be presentedd by the majority group at CFAF 282,750F : that he pleaded that the judgement of 30 April 1992 to share the estate according to Muslim Law should be withdrawn: that Kadiatou DIARRA should present the retirement benefits she has received so far: that the rents collected by the heirs of late Gaoussou DRAME should be set at CFAF 282, 7501instead of CFAF4,572,000 : Whereas in her statement of defence, Barrister TRAORE Aminata