Previous 1 / 88 Next

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 31/01 ELLEN JORDAN First Appellant LOUISA JOHANNA FRANCINA BROODRYK CHRISTINE LOUISE JACOBS Second Appellant Third Appellant versus THE STATE Respondent SEX WORKERS EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY TASKFORCE CENTRE FOR APPLIED LEGAL STUDIES REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH UNIT COMMISSION FOR GENDER EQUALITY First Amicus Curiae Second Amicus Curiae Third Amicus Curiae Fourth Amicus Curiae PIETER CROUS AND MENELAOS GEMELIARIS Fifth Amicus Curiae ANDREW LIONEL PHILLIPS Sixth Amicus Curiae Heard on : Decided on : 5 and 6 March 2002 9 October 2002 JUDGMENT NGCOBO J:

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Ellen Jordan et al v Ellen Jordan ors, 2002

Cases

Country

Latitude: -31.005484474142992

Longitude: 23.460146846172638

Country (linked Cases): South Africa

Court: South Africa: Constitutional Court, South Africa

Date of judgement: Oct 9, 2002

Keywords

Arrest
Right to dignity
Sexual offences

Gender of victim

Female: Woman (18+)

Gender of accused/perpetrator

Gender not specified

Language: English

Summary: This case concerns a brothel-owner, brothel employee and prostitute/sex worker who were all convicted in the Magistrates Court of contravening the Sexual Offences Act of 1957. They appealed to the High Court, arguing that the relevant provisions were unconstitutional. The High Court found that the section of the Act which criminalizes carnal intercourse for reward was unconstitutional bus dismissed the appeal in respect of the sections of the Act which criminalize keeping or managing a brothel (the brothel provisions). The appellants then appealed to this Court, arguing that the brothel provisions should be found to be unconstitutional. They also argued that the High Court order invalidating the prostitution provision should be confirmed. The state opposed the appeal on the brothel provisions and also opposed confirmation of the order invalidating the prostitution provision.

The Court accordingly unanimously upholds the constitutionality of the brothel provisions and by a majority refuse to confirm the High Court order invalidating the prostitution provision. The convictions and sentences imposed upon the three appellants in the Magistrates’ Court are accordingly reinstated.

Primary Documents

S v Jordan and Others (Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task Force and Others as Amici Curiae.pdf
English
Download View