JUDGMENT
This matter comes before us by way of appeal from the
judgment of the Chief Justice. The appeal is directed at the
whole of the judgment in terms of which the following order was
made:
Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of M4173
with 6% interest from the date of the Judgment,
and taxed costs on party and party scale, including
the costs of CIV/APN/30/81, such costs to go into
the revenue of the Chief Legal Aid Officer under the
provisions of S . 1 0 ( 5 ) of the Legal Aid Act 1978
(Act No. 19 of 1978).'
The above order was made by the Chief Justice pursuant
to an action instituted by Respondent, (Plaintiff in the Court a quo,
and referred to as such herein) against Appellant (Defendant in the
Court below and referred to as such) for damages and certain other
financial relief arising out of an alleged seduction.
In the annexure to the notice of appeal, the following grounds
on which the judgment of the Chief Justice is challenged are set out:
'1.
That the Honourable Mr Justice T S Cotran erred in
finding that Mrs Manthabiseng Pitso was not prepared
to become involved more than she had already been
and accordingly disregarding her clear evidence
contradicting the Respondent.
3/....