1 REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL FRANGRANTE DELICTO One People-One Goal-One Faith ORDINARY PUBLIC HEARING DAKAR COURT OF APPEAL 14 April 2015 REGIONAL COURT OF In the ordinary public hearing of the Dakar Regional Court DAKAR on 14 April 20215, sitting in police criminal cases, the bench consisting of: Lady xxx, chairing judge Judgment N° xxx Police cases assisted by Mr. xxx and Lady xxx, members Prosecution N° xxx In the presence of xxx deputy public prosecutor and with the assistance of attorney xxx, Registrar The following judgment was rendered: OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PARTIES PROSECUTOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, applicant, following the interrogation report And of flagrante delicto of 03 April 2015; 1°) xxx AND 2°) xxx 1) xxx born on 10/07/1987 in Dakar of xxx and xxx, married and father of one child, taxi driver, domiciled in Guediawaye; VERSUS (civil parties) 1.xxxx 2) xxx born on 16/11/1965 in Keur Massar, son of xxx and xxx, married, 2.xxx and father of 3 children, driver, resident of Keur Massar. 3. xxx 4. xxx on one hand VERSUS 1. XXX born on 12/02/1984 in Dakar, of xxx and xxx, radio host, domiciled at Nord Foire, villa xxx, in his father’s home, bachelor and father of 2 children, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military; 2. xxx born on 12/9/1990, xxx, jobless, domiciled in HLM Grand Médine, in his mother’s home, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military; 3. xxx born on 03/11/1991 in Thiès xxx, student at ISM, domicile at Ouest Yoff in Apacsy in his father’s home, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military; 4. xxx born on 13/08/1990 in Dakar xxx, Master student at IAM domiciled in Nord Foire, villa xxx in his father’s homme, bachelor, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military; Accused of collection of personal data, assault and battery. In detention in pursuance to a detention warrant: 03 April 2015 On the other Questioned by the President at the hearing on 04/18/2021 in accordance with article 384 of the criminal procedure code, the defendants declared that they wanted to be tried immediately and the case was successively postponed until the hearing on 10 / 04/2015 to be tried and then deliberated at the hearing of 04/10/2015 and the judgment was rendered that same day;

Select target paragraph3