1
REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL
FRANGRANTE DELICTO
One People-One Goal-One Faith
ORDINARY PUBLIC HEARING
DAKAR COURT OF APPEAL
14 April 2015
REGIONAL COURT OF
In the ordinary public hearing of the Dakar Regional Court
DAKAR
on 14 April 20215, sitting in police criminal cases,
the bench consisting of: Lady xxx, chairing judge
Judgment N° xxx Police cases
assisted by Mr. xxx and Lady xxx, members
Prosecution N° xxx
In the presence of xxx deputy public prosecutor and with the assistance of attorney xxx,
Registrar
The following judgment was rendered:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC
PARTIES
PROSECUTOR
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, applicant, following the interrogation report
And
of flagrante delicto of 03 April 2015;
1°) xxx
AND
2°) xxx
1) xxx born on 10/07/1987 in Dakar of xxx and xxx, married and father
of one child, taxi driver, domiciled in Guediawaye;
VERSUS
(civil parties)
1.xxxx
2) xxx born on 16/11/1965 in Keur Massar, son of xxx and xxx, married,
2.xxx
and father of 3 children, driver, resident of Keur Massar.
3. xxx
4. xxx
on one hand
VERSUS
1. XXX born on 12/02/1984 in Dakar, of xxx and xxx, radio host, domiciled at Nord Foire, villa xxx, in his
father’s home, bachelor and father of 2 children, claiming to have never been convicted
nor listed as military;
2. xxx born on 12/9/1990, xxx, jobless, domiciled in HLM Grand Médine, in his mother’s home, claiming to
have never been convicted nor listed as military;
3. xxx born on 03/11/1991 in Thiès xxx, student at ISM, domicile at Ouest Yoff in Apacsy in his father’s
home, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military;
4. xxx born on 13/08/1990 in Dakar xxx, Master student at IAM domiciled in Nord Foire, villa xxx in his
father’s homme, bachelor, claiming to have never been convicted nor listed as military;
Accused of collection of personal data, assault and battery.
In detention in pursuance to a detention warrant: 03 April 2015
On the other
Questioned by the President at the hearing on 04/18/2021 in accordance with article 384 of the criminal procedure code,
the defendants declared that they wanted to be tried immediately and the case was successively postponed until the
hearing on 10 / 04/2015 to be tried and then deliberated at the hearing of 04/10/2015 and the judgment was rendered
that same day;