Uganda: Mukasa and Another v Attorney-General (2008) AHRLR 248 (UgHC 2008)   [27.] The LC1 Chairman was cross-examined during the hearing. He basically stuck to his story that he arrested the second applicant in the bar at Kireka where they were about to be lynched by residents for kissing in public, for their own protection.   [28.] The following issues were identified from the evidence adduced by both sides:   1.              Whether there was unlawful interference with the applicant’s privacy. 2.              Whether there was unlawful arrest and detention of the second applicant and by who? 3.              Whether there was unlawful search of the second applicant’s premises. 4.              Whether the second applicant was treated in a cruel, inhuman and disregarding manner. 5.              Whether the first applicant’s right to property was interfered with. 6.              Remedies if any available to the applicants. 10 / 19