The PW5 also stated that prior to the daughter’s presentation in the morning of 12/5/2014, the accused person came to the hospital telling her that he had body pain and he was weak. The PW5 then examined him and discovered that he has hernia; they took the blood sample of the accused for test and the result was negative. She wrote medical reports dated 22/5/14 and 19/5/14 which were admitted in evidence as Exhibits B and C respectively. Under cross-examination, PW5 stated that the victim told her that she had sex for the first time about 2 years before the presentation. The PW5 further stated that her finding in reported sexual assault was based on history but supported by the fact that her hymen was absent; that no one can trace the person who broke the hymen of a woman through examination. The witness stated that from her virginal examination, the sexual assault was not traced to the accused but through history; that from the report the victim has one year history of sexual assault by her father. The PW5 also stated that she examined the accused in respect of the sexual assault and she took his blood sample and the result of the tests is in the holder. She is available to relate her finding on the accused to the assault. PW5 further stated that the findings she had from the accused and the victim in respect of the blood test did not correlate; she did not see any semen on the girl, her findings is based on the history of the victim. 9