This appeal seems to be quite straight forward although the Appellant seems to be playing hide and seek in a Court of law. In one breath, the Appellant would admit having sexual intercourse with the Prosecutrix and in another, he brings up other issues. He sighted the PW1 at school while she was under his tutelage. He was her French teacher in a secondary school, not a university nor a post graduate school. The victim/prosecutrix testified as PW1. The testimony is very clear and graphic. I crave indulgence to reproduce part of the testimony extensively anon: By Bible and states in English. He was my French Teacher. The first time I had an encounter with the Accused person was in my Secondary School. Taidob College, Abeokuta when I was in JSS3. When I was in SS2, he came to me and said he wanted to marry me, that he liked me. Then I was 16 years old. Afterwards he constantly asked that I come to his office for recording of Students marks. After that, he slept with me (i.e. had sexual intercourse with me). He inserted his penis inside my vagina in his office. On 5th December, 2010, it was a Sunday and Mr. Aziaka called me on phone and asked me to come and see him in his house and that he was going to describe the home address to me. I had never been to his house before that day. He asked his brother to pick me up at a junction. His brother took me to his house (i.e. Accused person's house) where he later joined me. At that time, I was 17 years old. When I got there, he constantly had sex with me, the same thing he did when I was in SS2. He inserted his penis into my vagina 5 times. Afterwards, he gave me a drug to use - Postinor 2. I used the drug. He did