were no serous inconsistencies m position case to the comfortable :Qrosecution case. The and lady assessor were prosecution witnesses unammous· op1mon a clear of what accused,.,.,.,,._,,,,., the complainant. That that place. offence took place in light and the complainant viewed the culprit twice. day There was therefore no identity. · Michael I am m total agreement with opinion that accused found Consequently Gademba David is 1 the Penal Code Act. guilty JUDGE 13.10.2010 13.10.2010 produced. Alpha Okweny Resident accused on Attorney. brief. Interpreter. Resident State Attorney: and be convicted for the convicted of -@}?~ Musota Stephen judgment. 10 Claudia Chepsania c/ss 123 of