this kind ·susp101on fabricated to oeriore- drawing-the accused· from circumstantial evidence to that would weaken or destroy Lord Normand in.Teper v. R. 1952 A.C. 480 at P.489. the prosecution on 14.8.09 she came out AU~·~- stocks to help her fire. She saw in-law standing along the road. saw the. as standmg was the body holding a blood stained and below of the body the breast. The accused was PW.2 asked said ic was the accused whom she Where he had a stab wound on the left only one at the go and get dry her house why he killed cows. The wit11c:ss deceased, the same spot a with vegetables without seeing anything unusual around the . minutes same spot. When people answered threatened to alarm and one Nicholas com'Tonted him. The evidence of PW.2 is minutely corroborated by that PW.3 D/Sgt Egesa a cousin to PW.3 ran accused running opposite direction. asked him why · was nmning away, the she had disturbed him that had paid dowry for of PW.4 killed accused the said accused. 5:00p.m to which wife the """'"'.._."'""". . heard an scene he stopped and when PW.3 iilHl 10 yet that he had killed his made him sale deceased. Prosecution adduced himself in land · evidence Lwakhaka Police saying he had evening and relatives of the kill him. The medical evidence (PW.I) indicates 9 at hunting to deceased died of a