Being aggrieved, the Appellant appealed to the Court Below. On the 11th day of June 2015, the Court Below delivered its judgment by dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment of the trial Court. Still dissatisfied, the Appellant lodged another appeal to this Court by filing a Notice of Appeal on the 12th of June 2015 predicated upon three grounds as reproduced hereunder less their particulars: 1. The lower Court erred when it affirmed the decision of the trial Court (Upper Sharia Court, Gwandu) which ordered the Appellant to perform naming ceremony of the baby given birth to by the Appellant's wife without justification. 2. The lower Court erred in law and thereby occasioned a serious miscarriage of justice when the learned Kadis denied the Appellant his fundamental right of fair hearing. 3. The decision of the trial Court is against the weight of evidence. 3 The Appellant distilled two issues for determination in this appeal thus: (a) Whether the Court below was right to have affirmed the decision of the trial Court which confirmed the paternity of the child to the Appellant? (Distilled from grounds one and three) (b) Whether the Appellant was denied fair hearing. (Distilled from ground two) The first issue is wide enough in scope to cover the second one or at least both issues are intertwined. Arguing the issues, the learned counsel for the Appellant A. A. Fingilla, Esq. submitted that the trite position of Islamic Law is that he who asserts must prove by calling evidence to establish his case. Reference was made to the book titled Thamarud-Dani page 608. Further reference was made to the cases of Muhammad A. Aidami v. Bukar Kusumi (2007) 3 SLR (Pt. IV) Pg. 208 at 213 and Mafolaku v. Alamu (1990) 1 LR 60 at 73. It was argued for the Appellant that paternity of a child under Islamic Law is presumed where: a. A marriage contract exists between the spouses either de jure or de facto. b. There is actual consummation or possibility of consummation between the spouses without any legal hindrance. This includes seclusion between the husband and

Select target paragraph3