must emphasize against only a part of the said judgment of the court below on the following single ground of appeal to wit: GROUNDS OF APPEAL: 1. The Learned Trial Judge misdirected himself on the facts when he found that both parties contributed towards the substantial works carried out on the matrimonial home amounting to D305, 546 despite the evidence that only the Appellant herein contributed all of the said amount. PARTICULARS OF MISDIRECTION: (a) (b) The learned trial judge didn’t avert his mind to the fact that the valuation report which costed the works at D305, 546 was exhibited by the Appellant herein as the value of the works she carried out on the property. Having concluded that there was no evidence to controvert or attack the value of development as exhibited to her further affidavit in reply by the Appellant herein, the learned trial judge the held that the Appellant is only entitled to half share of this said value. RELIEF SOUGHT FROM THE GAMBIA COURT OF APPEAL: To vary and substitute the sum of D152, 773 for the sum of D305, 546 as the value of the Appellant’s equitable share in the Respondent’s property. This being the ground of appeal filed herein, may I also say that this is also an application being brought to this Court pursuant to Sections 12 and 43 of The Women’s Act 2010. The parties were ordered to file and exchange briefs of argument on the 14th of March 2016. Each counsel was asked how long they required to write their briefs of arguments. Counsel for the Appellant CA – JUDGMENT MATTY FAYE V DAWDA JAWARA Page 3