not to with each· I will separately beginning with ingredient I whether unlawful sexual intercourse was performed on complainant. ; ' According to evider1ce of PW.2 Namataka Jesca, the ccrnplainant she was at home with her .........u...,... the accused. He her to lie bedroom made facing up. That the father lay on her and "did bad manners to her in the private she uses urinate". was an obvious reference to sexual intercourse. She felt pain, accused closed her mouth and the 's prevent her was minutely corroborated by the evidence of PW.4 who testified that while this was still orlPVv.4 Nabukwasi bed. \iVhen the people. She ·sex with their saw PvV.4, he jumped and retreated to sitting room from where he escaped. by plantation the accused ready came back daughter on who had gone ..,u._,,...,"'""'u blood coming out. This evidence was made an alarm which was her daughter's private and saw corroborated by evidence which was admitted uncontested during the preliminary · evidence Dr. Rubanza police ,,,...,u. . . ...,u,, of this case. PW.2 and his 5 the m