. ' about the case. That he never had sex with his daughtet. him on allegation allegation while he defiled his daughter. He only saw heard the of the ccurt during the testimony of prosecutic..n witnesses. further with his-wife (PW :4) and In opinion of lady and gentleman assessors to wit and Claudia Chepsania I was advised to convict the accused. of proof of all the ingredients all criminal trials,; the charged lies on the prosecution throughout the All the ingredients of otherwise. one is a statutory are a wealth of authorities or where law legal preposition but the often quoted. Woolmington v. DPP 1935 A.C 462. section 129(3) contrary to is indicted for the instant case, has does this burden be proved by evidence beyond offence reasonable doubt save At no the offence 4(a) and (c) the Code Act prosecution therefore burden of proving that:- i) was unlawful sexual ·~"""".,..'"'"""'"'" ,. . . . ~..,.,. . . J esca. ii) complainant was below 14 the this case