claims confirmation of the contested judgment and rejection of this request. Objection is admitted in form, as it was submitted within the legal time. In subject, and after reviewing the minutes of the case and other papers, i find that what has been mentioned by respondent regarding his mother’s house, has not been dealt with in the case and the expert evidence has shown that he works on his own. The statement of appellant regarding the agricultural lands and estate in Medani does not appear in the minutes and appellant did not prove that, nevertheless, I believe that, the preliminary judgment deciding these amounts was issued two years ago, the children grew up and they are in different education stages and the amount decided by the Trial Court represents the basic food for six children, however, each of the two parties may raise a new case to the Court to increase or decrease the alimony if any or both of them consider this amount does not match the current living condition or the income of respondent. Therefore, if my respectful colleagues agree, I believe that the judgment issued by the Court of Appeal shall be cancelled and to confirm the judgment issued by the Trial Court. Abdul Aziz Al Rasheed, “signed” Judge at the Supreme Court 30/08/2015 Al Bushra Osman Salih “signed” Judge at the Supreme Court 02/09/2015