December 2014 for proper administration of justice; When the case was called, the Public Prosecutor stated that he had called the above-mentioned suspect before the Court at the hearing of the day in order to make his defense for the above-mentioned offence; The Registrar read out the content of the case file; The suspect was interrogated. The registrar took note of the answers of the suspects; The Public Prosecutor summarized the facts of the case and applied for two years of imprisonment; The suspect made his submissions; The debates were closed and the matter adjourned for deliberation and judgment on 23 December 2014; After deliberation according to the law, the court made the decision in following terms: The Court Considering evidence on records; Considering the interrogation statement of the accused; Considering the claims for civil damages; Considering the application of the public prosecutor; Taking into account submissions of the accused and his counsel; After deliberation in accordance with the law; On criminal action Whereas, according to the interrogation statement No… dated 07 November 2014, …was referred to this Court, on allegations that in any event before the prescription of the criminal action in Dakar in 2014 he committed, using violence, coercion and threat, sexual penetration on …; having in same circumstances of time and place, by touching, caressing or manipulating, committed pedophilia on the above mentioned minor being less than 16 years old; having used force for kidnapping the said minor from the place known par her parents; Offences provided and punished by articles 320, 320 bis and 348 of the Penal Code; Whereas the public prosecutor after summarizing the facts of the case, applied for 2 years of imprisonment for the accused; Whereas the facts the suspect is accused of are consistent and that it is appropriate to sentence him to 5 years of imprisonment;