In reading the trial record, I disagree with the trial court's decision to sentence the accused and punish them for the following reasons: Proven by the testimony of the victim and the driver who drove him home, that the accused Khamis, Al-Sadig and Youssef were next to her house when she arrived. This confirms the victim's story that she was taken by force. This is evidenced by the fact that she left her shoes, and the bread she was carrying. According to the witness who was present at the home of the complainant with his mother, he confirmed this and the medical report (indictment no. 1) confirmed the signs of a violent sexual act. This charge is amended under Article 149 k.j because Article 145 of the Penal Code that is mentioned in paragraph 2, states that the sexual process is performed by entering the penis in whole or in part. This was not mentioned in the medical report and no sperm was found because the victim was informed 24 hours later. The return of non-judicial recognition weakens the credibility of the truth and is as irrefutable proof. We therefore believe that the conviction should be based on Article 151 K.J against Al-Sadig Ibrahim Abdullah, Khamis Adam Abdullah and Youssef Abdallah Daoud. As for the other accused, there is no evidence of these, apart from the complainant's statements. I ask to cancel the charge and them be released unless they are wanted in other cases. As for the compensation awarded by the court, it was not examined in the terms of the judgment and no evidence was heard on it. In addition, the expense department did not receive a copy of this decision. For that, I ask to refer the file to the court to impose the appropriate penalty under Article (12/151) K. J to the accused mentioned and to hear the evidence with respect to the mandate, then to decide after the consent of my colleagues Youssef Ishak Ahmad Judge of Appeal 04/16/2018 Adel al-Hussein Haj Hamad Abu Sufyan Mohammad Youssef Judge of Appeal Judge of Appeal 24/4/2018 25/4/2018 The final decision Cancel the conviction of the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh defendants and release them unless they are required in other cases. Amendment of the punishment of convicted persons I, II and III under Article 151 of the 1991 Criminal Code